Remembering Longtime Community Leader, Lee Herron

Georgia Bio Members & Partners:
 
It is with a heavy heart that I share with you the sad news that Georgia has lost one of its long-time innovation and entrepreneurship champions with the passing of Dr. Lee Herron last Friday, July 12.


Lee was a dear friend, colleague, mentor, and irreplaceable leader within our community. He retired from Georgia Research Alliance (GRA) in spring 2024 after a 16-year career with the Alliance. Most recently, Lee led GRA’s agricultural technology programs including the Greater Yield initiative. He directed its award-winning venture development program for 15 years, which helped to launch 200+ university-based companies that attracted more than $2 billion in equity investment. A seasoned executive, Lee harnessed his 20 years of entrepreneurial experience to help startups develop sound business strategies. Prior to joining GRA, Lee managed the biosciences division of Georgia Tech’s Advanced Technology Development Center (ATDC), advising early-stage life science companies. Lee served in many community leadership capacities including on the boards of Georgia Bio, Southeast Life Sciences, the Global Center for Medical Innovation’s Industry Advisory Board, the Biolocity Oversight Committee and the NSF Center for Cell Manufacturing Technology’s Commercialization Advisory Board.

I am at a loss to even estimate the vast impact he has had on so many of us not only in a business capacity but also as a wise and caring leader whose warmth and humanity characterized every interaction with him. I encourage you to read the moving tributes from GRA here, and his protégé, Ashley Cornelison’s LinkedIn post here. For those that did not know Lee, these tributes help to paint the picture of a brilliant and kind man who will leave an indelible mark on many across our industry. 

On a personal note, Lee has been a mentor, sounding board, and friend throughout my 18 years at Georgia Bio. A regular volunteer with Georgia Bio for over 2 decades, Lee would provide his feedback on nominees for our annual awards without hesitation and with his trademark candor; he always jumped to help the organization build its network; and served in various leadership capacities including as chair for our Life Sciences Summit in 2017 (pictured). At the same time, he would remember to ask me about my daughter and remind me to take care of myself. Lee enjoyed and excelled at connecting with people, and his health challenges rarely slowed him down. In looking at my last texts with him from mid-May, he was still committing to providing feedback on our Golden Helix Award nominees and suggesting he introduce me to one of his industry colleagues. I am truly heartbroken. His honesty, humor, and guidance on a personal and professional level will be missed.
 
Lee was an early recipient of Georgia Bio’s highest honor, the Industry Growth Fellow Award in 2008. Georgia Bio will honor Lee and his legacy at this year’s Georgia Life Sciences Summit on October 22.
 
Please continue sending your thoughts and prayers for Lee’s wife Rita and the Herron family.

A memorial service will take place this Thursday, July 18. More here.
 
With heartfelt sympathy,


Maria
President & CEO
Georgia Bio

Georgia Life Sciences Designates City of Atlanta as Newest BioReady® Community

By Sheran Brown • February 21, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences Designates City of Atlanta as Newest BioReady® Community

Bipartisan PBM Reform Back in Focus as House Committee Plans Hearing

By Sheran Brown • February 20, 2025
A renewed push for prescription drug cost reform is gaining momentum in Congress, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee's health subcommittee planning a hearing on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reform for late February. The hearing, to be led by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), signals a revival of bipartisan efforts to regulate these pharmaceutical intermediaries. PBMs, which negotiate drug prices for insurers and employers, have become a focal point in the broader discussion of healthcare costs. A previous bipartisan agreement to regulate these entities was crafted by Carter and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) in the last Congress, though it ultimately stalled when the larger spending bill it was attached to faced opposition. The reform efforts enjoy broad support from both parties and the president, making it one of the few areas with potential for bipartisan cooperation. However, new complications have emerged as Republicans consider using PBM regulations to generate savings for their broader policy agenda, potentially requiring up to $880 billion in cost reductions. The path forward remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about whether such reforms would qualify for budget reconciliation and whether using PBM regulations as a funding mechanism could derail bipartisan cooperation. Meanwhile, stakeholders continue to disagree on the impact of additional PBM regulation, with pharmaceutical companies arguing that PBMs inflate drug costs while PBMs contend that new regulations would increase prices.

Council on State Biotechnology Associations says NIH funds are a critical component of innovation ecosystem

By Sheran Brown • February 20, 2025
The Council of State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) has issued a strong warning about proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, emphasizing the critical role these grants play in America's biotech innovation ecosystem. The statement, below , comes amid concerns over recent guidance that would reduce NIH funding to key research institutions. ----------------------- “Today, the US biotech industry employs nearly 2.3 million people across the US and is making positive contributions to economic impact and national security across all 50 states. In fact, for every dollar the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contributes to a successful drug, the private sector invests over $65, underscoring the agency’s unparalleled return on investment. As the associations representing the bioscience industry across the nation, the Council on State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) is concerned by recent guidance that would cut funding provided by the NIH to universities, hospitals, and other institutions that perform critical early-stage research. NIH grant funds are a critical component of our innovation ecosystem. Grants for basic research are the spark that leads to university-driven discoveries, with public-private partnerships and tech transfers that bridge early-stage research to industry-sponsored drug development and ultimately to FDA approved medical advances for hundreds of diseases. While the administration looks for greater efficiency in the use of taxpayer dollars, it cannot be overstated - once scientific innovation moves abroad, it may never return. In the race for scientific innovation around the world, as our adversaries continue to increase government investments in research, we encourage President Trump to follow suit and ensure that we maintain our global leadership in an industry that was created and thrives across the US.”
MORE POSTS
Share by: