Georiga Bio sign-on to the State Medical Technology Alliance (SMTA) letter to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. Please see the language below.


The Honorable Alex M. Azar II
Secretary
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201

The Honorable Seema Verma
Administrator
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
7500 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21244


Dear Secretary Azar and Administrator Verma:

As members of the State Medical Technology Alliance (SMTA), we are state and regional life sciences associations representing biotechnology, medical device companies, universities, research institutions, and venture capital firms across the country, all dedicated to developing and delivering life-enhancing and life-saving products, we write to express our strong support for your leadership in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) efforts to provide coverage for transformative medical devices that are approved as breakthrough devices by the FDA.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for our nation’s health care system to better align care for patients.  We commend HHS for taking swift action to create appropriate waivers and incentives across different health care stakeholders to better address this devastating disease.  Providing patients with access to breakthrough devices would further this push to align care for patients by promoting innovation and providing patients with the latest in life-changing medical technology.

The medical technology industry is an important and thriving sector in the U.S. economy, creating jobs in all 50 states and representing a sizable portion of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product.  The industry is responsible for about 1.9 million jobs in the U.S. and an economic output of approximately $381 billion annually.

Access to state-of-the art medical technology and diagnostics can help to improve care and patient outcomes, and CMS has acknowledged the value of breakthrough products by including a Breakthrough Product Pathway for new technology add-on payments (NTAP) in the Final Rule on the FY 2020 Inpatient Prospective Payment System. 

We commend HHS and CMS for these efforts and urge you to take the next step by providing coverage for all medical devices that are approved and cleared as FDA-designated breakthrough in all settings.  Providing this needed certainty will help ensure the next round of truly life-changing innovation can get to the patients who need them as quickly as possible.

As members of the SMTA, we look forward to working with the Administration to finalize this critical effort.



Sincerely,


Arizona BioIndustry Association (AZBio)

Biocom: Life Science Association of California

BioFlorida

BioForward Wisconsin

BioOhio

Bioscience Association of West Virginia (BioWV)

BioUtah

California Life Sciences Association (CLSA)

Colorado BioScience Association (CBSA)

Florida Medical Manufacturers Consortium (FMMC)

Georgia Bio

Healthcare Institute of New Jersey (HINJ)   

Illinois Biotechnology Innovation Organization (iBIO)

Indiana Health Industry Forum (IHIF)

Indiana Medical Device Manufacturers Council (IMDMC)

Iowa Biotechnology Association (IowaBio)

Kentucky Life Sciences Council

Life Sciences Pennsylvania

Life Science Tennessee

Life Science Washington

Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council (MassMEDIC)

Medical Alley Association

MedTech Association New York

Michigan Biosciences Industry Association (MichBio)

Mississippi Biotechnology Association

Missouri Biotechnology Association (MOBIO)

NCBIO

SCBIO

Southeast Life Sciences

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute (THBI)

By Sheran Brown February 21, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences Designates City of Atlanta as Newest BioReady® Community
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
A renewed push for prescription drug cost reform is gaining momentum in Congress, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee's health subcommittee planning a hearing on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reform for late February. The hearing, to be led by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), signals a revival of bipartisan efforts to regulate these pharmaceutical intermediaries. PBMs, which negotiate drug prices for insurers and employers, have become a focal point in the broader discussion of healthcare costs. A previous bipartisan agreement to regulate these entities was crafted by Carter and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) in the last Congress, though it ultimately stalled when the larger spending bill it was attached to faced opposition. The reform efforts enjoy broad support from both parties and the president, making it one of the few areas with potential for bipartisan cooperation. However, new complications have emerged as Republicans consider using PBM regulations to generate savings for their broader policy agenda, potentially requiring up to $880 billion in cost reductions. The path forward remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about whether such reforms would qualify for budget reconciliation and whether using PBM regulations as a funding mechanism could derail bipartisan cooperation. Meanwhile, stakeholders continue to disagree on the impact of additional PBM regulation, with pharmaceutical companies arguing that PBMs inflate drug costs while PBMs contend that new regulations would increase prices.
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
The Council of State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) has issued a strong warning about proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, emphasizing the critical role these grants play in America's biotech innovation ecosystem. The statement, below , comes amid concerns over recent guidance that would reduce NIH funding to key research institutions. ----------------------- “Today, the US biotech industry employs nearly 2.3 million people across the US and is making positive contributions to economic impact and national security across all 50 states. In fact, for every dollar the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contributes to a successful drug, the private sector invests over $65, underscoring the agency’s unparalleled return on investment. As the associations representing the bioscience industry across the nation, the Council on State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) is concerned by recent guidance that would cut funding provided by the NIH to universities, hospitals, and other institutions that perform critical early-stage research. NIH grant funds are a critical component of our innovation ecosystem. Grants for basic research are the spark that leads to university-driven discoveries, with public-private partnerships and tech transfers that bridge early-stage research to industry-sponsored drug development and ultimately to FDA approved medical advances for hundreds of diseases. While the administration looks for greater efficiency in the use of taxpayer dollars, it cannot be overstated - once scientific innovation moves abroad, it may never return. In the race for scientific innovation around the world, as our adversaries continue to increase government investments in research, we encourage President Trump to follow suit and ensure that we maintain our global leadership in an industry that was created and thrives across the US.”
MORE POSTS
Share by: