Georgia Bio Innovation Summit Recap

Last week, Georgia Bio welcomed more than 600 attendees and 110 industry experts to the first-ever virtual Georgia Bio Innovation Summit—and the timing couldn’t have been better.

Starting the day after Election Day, we had three productive days of discussions about four critical challenges ahead: getting through the pandemic and economic crisis; tackling climate change; ending racial injustice; and standing up for science.

The key takeaway from the week: life sciences, including Georgia’s thriving biotechnology industry, will play a key role in finding solutions for all of them.

Here’s how.

1. Biotechnology is critical to building resilience.

COVID-19 has demonstrated the significant impact a pandemic can have on our health, our livelihoods, our food supply, and our economy, said Everett Hoekstra, President of Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc. , during the event kickoff.

This year has provided the life sciences industry with a clear vision of our collective purpose to serve mankind with lifesaving, lifechanging, and life enhancing health care, he continued.

“Now more than ever we’ve seen the importance of biotechnology in our everyday lives,” said U.S. Secretary of Agriculture (and Georgia native) Sonny Perdue .

With the national response to the pandemic and its impacts, we’ve seen “the critical role of innovation—specifically biological innovation—at play in mitigating supply chain risks and building resilience into our food and farming systems of the future,” continued Secretary Perdue.

So, how do we get there?

2. We need trust in science.

While science has been progressing faster than ever before, “we still struggle with how the public views what we do,” said Dr. Michelle McMurry-Heath, President and CEO of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) , during the opening keynote.

“Political interference with science is not a one-party issue,” she said. “It is very tempting for politicians to think that it’s easy to tweak the science or push the science to meet their own political ends.”

This is why the scientific community must “stand up when we see a misuse or misappropriation of science,” and ensure we’re producing the highest-quality, well-tested science.

Biotechnology is “the industry that’s going to build the road for us to recover and grow. I just hope that our companies retain that focus, that I know they have,” she said, as well as “rebuild the pride in the work that we do.”

“How do we go back to having a society that trusts truth and trusts the data?” asked Dr. Seth Berkley, CEO of Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance , later in the week. “Everybody can have their own opinions, but they can’t have their own facts.”

“With that trust in science, I think we can do a lot of healing,” he said.

3. We need collaboration.

The global biotechnology industry has launched more than 800 research programs targeting COVID-19—including 11 vaccine candidates that have reached phase 3 clinical trials—in less than one year. How?

Speakers during a keynote on COVID-19 vaccines agreed: collaboration is key.

Dr. Paul Burton, Chief Global Medical Affairs Officer for Janssen Pharmaceuticals , said partnerships—with government, with health authorities, with industry, and between companies large and small—have been critical to this unprecedented response.

“We are in competition against the virus—we’re not in competition with each other,” he said.

Dr. Kathleen Toomey, Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Public Health, credited  collaboration with the state and local response, as well—working together “across districts and counties” with hospitals, health care providers, community organizations, and the business community to “keep people healthy at the same time we can keep the economy open” and communicate more effectively.

“Even though, in many instances, we are competitors, when it comes to finding solutions for humanity, we can be a force,” added Patty Fritz, VP of U.S. Corporate Affairs for UCB, Inc.

4. We need diversity and inclusion.

Given COVID-19’s disproportionate impact on Black, African American, Hispanic, Latinx, and other communities of color, diversity and inclusion are key to overcoming the pandemic, as well—in particular, ensuring minority groups are represented in clinical trials.

“To be successful in vaccine development,” continued Janssen’s Burton, “we have to provide transparency and confidence for ethnic minorities in clinical trials and underrepresented groups.”

This strategy will help us well beyond the pandemic, said Dr. Alejandro Cané, VP, U.S. Medical and Scientific Affairs Lead at Pfizer Vaccines .

But we shouldn’t stop at diversity in clinical trials, said Dr. Clement Lewin, Associate Vice President, Head, BARDA Office and NV Stakeholder Engagement at Sanofi Pasteur . We must eliminate socioeconomic or racial disparities in terms of access and acceptance of the vaccine, as well.

All of this requires the industry itself to be diverse and inclusive, too. (It’s one of the reasons why Day 3 focused on D&I in the workforce and STEM education.) 

“We need to make sure we’re putting particular emphasis on those communities, and, again, having people who represent those communities who are spokespeople,” explained Helene Gayle, MD, MPH, President & CEO of The Chicago Community Trust , because these populations have “perhaps the most to gain because of the high burden of disease.”

“We want to make sure that those populations are getting the information that they need, but it’s being done by institutions and individuals who are trusted, so we can build that trust,” she said.

“We are going to travel at the speed of trust. It’s not good enough to just have a vaccine if nobody wants to get vaccinated,” she added.

Did you miss something during the event?

It’s not too late to catch up!

Until November 30 th , you can login to the Georgia Bio Innovation Summit platform to access every session on-demand—including 6 keynotes and 20 breakout sessions!

(You can continue networking virtually with sponsors, exhibitors, and fellow attendees until November 30 th , too.)

Join the conversation on social media . Follow us on Twitter at @Georgia_Bio and #GaBioSummit.

The post Georgia Bio Innovation Summit Recap appeared first on Georgia Bio.

June 17, 2026
As part of the Georgia Life Sciences Summit (August 25–26), applications are now open for the Startup Showcase , sponsored by Johnson & Johnson , highlighting early-stage innovation across MedTech and Therapeutics . The Showcase will feature some of Georgia’s most innovative life science startups, giving emerging companies the opportunity to present groundbreaking technologies, products, and solutions to a distinguished audience of industry leaders, investors, researchers, and partners. Selected startups will present during the August 26 luncheon program and participate in a live investor Q&A session with John Gutierrez (Ascenta Capital), Emma Heckenberg, Ph.D. (Solas BioVentures), Patrick Jordan (NovaQuest Capital Management), and Emily Dinu (Numinous Capital) Members of the Johnson & Johnson external innovation team will also be onsite for the program and select companies will be scheduled for a 1:1 meeting to discuss strategic alignment and potential collaboration opportunities. If you or companies in your network are building in MedTech or Therapeutics, this is a strong opportunity to gain visibility, receive feedback on commercialization and growth strategy, and connect with key stakeholders. All applicants receive a complimentary Summit registration, and one selected company will also be invited to participate in the NewYorkBIO / New York Stock Exchange Life Sciences Showcase on December 10. If this is relevant to your work, it would be a strong opportunity to consider applying. If not, it may be worth sharing with companies in your network who are building in this space.
June 15, 2026
Workforce & Education Impact: Building Georgia's Future  Life Sciences Workforce - One Teacher at a Time June 16, 2026 - As Georgia Life Sciences concludes the 2025-2026 cycle of the Biotech Teacher Training Initiative (BTTI), the results reinforce the critical role educators play in building the state's future life sciences workforce. Since July of 2025, BTTI engaged 98 educators representing 40 schools across 23 school systems, reaching an estimated 5,375 students through hands-on biotechnology instruction, career-connected learning, and industry-relevant classroom experiences. The Georgia Life Sciences Equipment Depot further expanded the program's impact by supporting 238 teachers with access to laboratory equipment and materials that make authentic life sciences learning possible. Georgia Life Sciences is also pleased to report that funding for BTTI was maintained in the Georgia House version of the FY 2027 budget approved earlier this year. The upcoming 2026-2027 program cycle will mark an important evolution for BTTI. Building on feedback from industry partners and workforce trends across the life sciences sector, Georgia Life Sciences will expand the program's scope to better reflect the skills and competencies employers increasingly need. In addition to foundational biotechnology concepts, future programming will be organized around key industry domains, including Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC), Research & Development (R&D), MedTech, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Advanced Manufacturing. This expanded approach will provide educators with greater insight into the breadth of career opportunities available across Georgia's life sciences ecosystem while helping students develop awareness of the technologies and disciplines shaping the industry's future. The impact extends far beyond individual workshops, creating lasting connections between Georgia classrooms and the state's growing life sciences ecosystem while helping build the talent pipeline that will power Georgia's future innovation economy. "Before BTTI, I was hesitant to do biotech labs because they seemed too complex and expensive," shared Josephine Jeganathan of Stockbridge High School. "The program showed me how simplified it can be and provided the equipment and materials needed to successfully implement the Central Dogma Lab with all my classes." Teachers are also seeing increased student engagement through hands-on learning experiences. Tonie Curry of North Clayton High School used a chromatography lab to connect environmental science concepts to water pollution and sustainability. "Students were highly interested in seeing how substances separated and made strong connections to water pollution and environmental sustainability," Curry noted. "The hands-on nature of the lab encouraged curiosity and deeper understanding." For many educators, one of the most valuable aspects of the program is the connection between classroom learning and real-world careers. As Marshai Waiters of Marietta Middle School reflected: "Exposure is key. There are so many avenues to work in STEM, and they are all accessible with opportunity and knowledge. The insights gained from industry speakers will inform my teaching and create new opportunities for student exposure." When teachers are trained, equipped, and connected to industry, students gain more than a science lesson—they gain a window into Georgia's life sciences future.
June 10, 2026
In recent comments to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), PULSE highlighted critical reforms to ensure that U.S. competition policies support – and do not impede – the pro-competitive mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and other collaborations that drive American life sciences innovation. PULSE submitted comments in response to two joint DOJ/FTC Requests related to Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors and Improvements to the Premerger Notification and Report Form (HSR Form). Read below for key takeaways from PULSE’s comment letters: 1. Life Sciences Innovation Depends on Collaboration “At its core, life sciences innovation is overwhelmingly collaborative. The cutting-edge medicines and cures developed by America’s life sciences industry are rarely the result of just one sole actor. Instead, they more often emerge from a calibrated sequence of partnerships… that collectively usher a biomedical breakthrough from early-stage discovery to FDA approval and delivery to patients.” – PULSE, Comments on Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors 2. Policies that Ignore the Fundamental Role of Life Sciences M&A Risk Chilling Innovation for Patients “Against the significant challenges and pressures inherent to life sciences innovation, such policies that needlessly delay pro-competitive transactions have significant ripple effects: eroded investment incentives, disruptions in the path to launch and, ultimately, slowed or stalled development of new treatments and cures for patients.” – PULSE, Comments on Improvements to the HSR Form 3. Clear, Predictable Standards Can Support Competition and Innovation in America’s Life Sciences Ecosystem “Preserving clear and workable pathways for collaboration is therefore essential to sustain the broader ecosystem that delivers innovation and sustains America’s status as the world leader in life sciences innovation.” – PULSE, Comments on Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors Leading business and industry organizations echoed and reinforced these priorities. Their comments highlight the unique market dynamics of life sciences innovation and the importance of collaboration and M&A – particularly with respect to early-stage R&D. “Because drug development typically takes over a decade, and the vast majority of drugs in development never make it to market, the antitrust risks associated with R&D collaborations in this space may be less than with other R&D collaborations.” – ABA Antitrust Law Section, Comments on Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors “In the biopharmaceutical sector, for instance, R&D ventures in the pre-clinical or Phase I stages should be presumed lawful. At these early stages, about 90% of drugs never make it to market, so these collaborations are far too distant from commercialization to pose a meaningful threat to competition.” – U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Comments on Guidance for Collaborations Among Competitors “Healthy M&A activity also aids company formation and capital raising earlier in a business’s life cycle, as entrepreneurs and early-stage investors often depend on M&A for an exit opportunity. Conversely, discouraging business combinations by imposing burdensome one-size-fits-all standards on all transactions, like those imposed by the 2024 amendments, would disincentivize early-stage innovation and slow down economic growth.” – National Association of Manufacturers, Comments on Improvements to the HSR Form The bottom line: A balanced approach to antitrust enforcement policy should support life sciences M&A and other collaborations, ensuring new medicines continue to reach patients, while preserving a diverse and collaborative ecosystem. PULSE urges the agencies to adopt clear, workable and predictable standards that companies can apply with confidence. That includes preserving enforcement safety zones for low-risk, pro-competitive collaborations, as well as ensuring the HSR Form facilitates a timely, focused and fit-for-purpose screening process for life sciences M&A deals. Click below to read PULSE’s full comments: PULSE Comments on Guidelines on Collaborations Among Competitors PULSE Comments on Improvements to the HSR Form Source: PULSE Urges FTC, DOJ to Support Pro-Competitive Life Sciences Collaborations and M&A - Partnership for the U.S. Life Science Ecosystem (PULSE)
MORE POSTS