By: Scott Whitaker, AdvaMed

After a long delay, a final Medicare policy provides quicker coverage for certain breakthrough medical technologies. While a step in the right direction, the new policy isn’t enough. The best hope for delivering breakthrough medtech to 65 million Medicare beneficiaries is congressional action this fall. 


Groundbreaking medical discoveries come online all the time but it can take years for Medicare to make these innovations available to its patients. FDA’s “breakthrough” program allows manufacturers to work with the FDA to expedite the review and approval of certain medical devices that provide for more effective treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions. 


Innovative technologies can better diagnose Alzheimer’s disease or treat certain cancers in a less invasive way, all of them deemed safe and effective by FDA’s rigorous standards. 


However, Medicare coverage of these innovations is often too slow or non-existent. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies (TCET) pathway is a partial solution that comes after a long wait. 


TCET is a step toward a stronger, more robust policy, but it doesn’t go far enough to help the Medicare beneficiaries depending on breakthrough diagnostics and treatments to alleviate their suffering. 


The limited number of devices CMS can handle – only five or fewer per year – demonstrates clearly to Congress the need for greater resources at CMS. 


And the exclusion of diagnostics is disappointing, particularly considering the potential for a breakthrough diagnostic technology to save not only lives but costs to the health care system overall through earlier detection. Many patient and provider groups disagree with CMS’ narrow approach. 


However, hope isn’t lost. While CMS was finishing its limited proposal, Congress advanced legislation that could be more comprehensive in meeting patients’ needs. The House Ways and Committee passed H.R. 1691, the Ensuring Patient Access to Critical Breakthrough Products Act of 2023, in June. The bipartisan measure would allow the designated medical devices to be covered over a four-year transitional period. As amended and passed, the bill also excludes diagnostics, though the committee clarified the intent to cover diagnostics. The Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee passed H.R. 1691 as well. 


Congress has limited legislative days this fall in a busy election year. Passing bipartisan legislation to solve a longstanding challenge and give new medical options to older Americans and their doctors would be a welcome use of the congressional agenda. 


In addition to serving patients with new, existing medtech, passage would encourage medtech innovation. 


Medtech companies invest millions of dollars in research and development to create transformative technologies. The majority of these innovators are small companies with only a few products in their portfolio. The looming uncertainty of CMS coverage stifles innovation and poses significant concerns for these companies’ long-term viability. 


Bigger medtech companies fare no better in getting their groundbreaking medical innovations to Medicare beneficiaries. 


Edwards Lifesciences’ tricuspid heart valve replacement system, an FDA-designated breakthrough device, received FDA approval February 1, 2024. Although many patients suffering the debilitating effects of tricuspid valve disease have no other options for treatment, existing Medicare rules delay coverage that may provide quick, equitable access to this procedure for the estimated 1.5 million U.S. patients suffering with tricuspid regurgitation. 


Studies show that, on average, patients wait over 5.5 years after FDA approval for valuable therapies to receive coverage. Without swift access to FDA-approved devices and tests, the health of millions of patients, especially those with limited resources, hangs in the balance. 


And it's not just about ensuring immediate access; it's also about promoting health equity among older Americans, many of whom rely solely on Medicare for health care coverage. Many breakthrough devices address conditions largely experienced by underserved, underrepresented, and vulnerable patient groups, helping alleviate and address health inequities. By ensuring access to FDA-approved breakthrough devices, better coverage would remove some of the biggest barriers preventing seniors, especially from underserved communities, from accessing treatments. 


The United States is the global leader in medtech, continuously pioneering cutting-edge technologies and enhancing patient outcomes. If we want to remain a powerhouse of innovation that does right by patients, we must fix this bureaucratic process and implement a predictable funding pathway. With the CMS policy thinner than it could be, the best chance for getting the job done is Congress this fall. Any must-pass end-of-year legislative wrap-up should include the breakthrough medtech coverage bill. 


Scott Whitaker is president and CEO of AdvaMed, the Medtech association, the largest trade association representing medical technology companies worldwide. 

------------------------------

Source: AdvaMed & https://www.realclearhealth.com/blog/2024/10/22/congress_is_best_hope_for_breakthrough_medtech_medicare_coverage_1066886.html

By Sheran Brown February 21, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences Designates City of Atlanta as Newest BioReady® Community
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
A renewed push for prescription drug cost reform is gaining momentum in Congress, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee's health subcommittee planning a hearing on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reform for late February. The hearing, to be led by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), signals a revival of bipartisan efforts to regulate these pharmaceutical intermediaries. PBMs, which negotiate drug prices for insurers and employers, have become a focal point in the broader discussion of healthcare costs. A previous bipartisan agreement to regulate these entities was crafted by Carter and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) in the last Congress, though it ultimately stalled when the larger spending bill it was attached to faced opposition. The reform efforts enjoy broad support from both parties and the president, making it one of the few areas with potential for bipartisan cooperation. However, new complications have emerged as Republicans consider using PBM regulations to generate savings for their broader policy agenda, potentially requiring up to $880 billion in cost reductions. The path forward remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about whether such reforms would qualify for budget reconciliation and whether using PBM regulations as a funding mechanism could derail bipartisan cooperation. Meanwhile, stakeholders continue to disagree on the impact of additional PBM regulation, with pharmaceutical companies arguing that PBMs inflate drug costs while PBMs contend that new regulations would increase prices.
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
The Council of State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) has issued a strong warning about proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, emphasizing the critical role these grants play in America's biotech innovation ecosystem. The statement, below , comes amid concerns over recent guidance that would reduce NIH funding to key research institutions. ----------------------- “Today, the US biotech industry employs nearly 2.3 million people across the US and is making positive contributions to economic impact and national security across all 50 states. In fact, for every dollar the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contributes to a successful drug, the private sector invests over $65, underscoring the agency’s unparalleled return on investment. As the associations representing the bioscience industry across the nation, the Council on State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) is concerned by recent guidance that would cut funding provided by the NIH to universities, hospitals, and other institutions that perform critical early-stage research. NIH grant funds are a critical component of our innovation ecosystem. Grants for basic research are the spark that leads to university-driven discoveries, with public-private partnerships and tech transfers that bridge early-stage research to industry-sponsored drug development and ultimately to FDA approved medical advances for hundreds of diseases. While the administration looks for greater efficiency in the use of taxpayer dollars, it cannot be overstated - once scientific innovation moves abroad, it may never return. In the race for scientific innovation around the world, as our adversaries continue to increase government investments in research, we encourage President Trump to follow suit and ensure that we maintain our global leadership in an industry that was created and thrives across the US.”
MORE POSTS
Share by: