Veranex did not acquire GCMI. They acquired the preclinical testing arm, T3 Labs, only.

Earlier this year, we shared the news that T3 Labs, the preclinical testing arm of GCMI, was sold to Veranex.

 

Due to a high number of ecosystem colleagues who have asked us directly, we are compelled to again share the following: 

 

Veranex did not acquire GCMI. They acquired the preclinical testing arm, T3 Labs, only.

 

GCMI has not been “taken private,” as we have heard colleagues state verbatim. 

 

To restate: Veranex did not acquire GCMI. 

 

Indeed, our comprehensive design and development entity is fully intact as an affiliate of Georgia Tech working every day to bring new technologies out of the labs of researchers, faculty and clinicians and into the realm of clinical care to improve patient outcomes, value provision and lives.

 

“Our mission is to help direct the development, testing, and commercialization of innovative medical devices that improve quality based outcomes and delivery of healthcare for patients,” GCMI Interim Executive Director Saylan Lukas wrote in January. “Helping to produce powerful, positive impacts on patients’ lives involves translating research from the lab to the clinic, including clinical trials, first in human studies and other required activities for FDA approval. We do this in support of Georgia Tech faculty, students and the ecosystem at large, and we do it every single day.

 

The dedicated team of engineers and medtech product development experts at GCMI works to support innovators from every background in the spectrum: from individual clinicians to researchers, faculty and students in engineering spaces with strong application to new medical technologies, to industry stalwarts and hospitals with high potential centers for medtech innovation like Children’s Philadelphia and Emory / CHOA.

 

As a Georgia Tech affiliate, we do this from our home base right here in midtown Atlanta a short distance from Science Square. Right here in Atlanta, Georgia, home to the world’s busiest airport, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, funding mechanisms and supporters like the Georgia Research Alliance (GRA), dozens of institutions of higher education including the nation’s top ranked biomedical engineering program and world-class hospitals and health systems. Every single attribute of a high performing center for medtech innovation lives here.

 

Our pathway expertise includes: market analysis, IP landscape & freedom to operate, Design History File (DHF) generation including prototyping, 3D printing, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), associated design verification and validation testing, human factors and useability testing, regulatory pathways, requirements and FDA submission data and manufacturing transfer. We are also capable of serving as “manufacturer of record” for first in human use, clinical trials and initial low volume commercialization of novel medical technologies.

 

You can see the impact and efficacy of our work in the success of innovators making an impact like Scott Hollister, PhD and his live saving pediatric airway technology, Jud Ready, PhD and Hub Hygiene, James Rains and Kamil Makhnejia at Jackson Medical, Omer Inan, PhD and DetectIV and NFANT Labs among scores of others.

 

If you have not done so, please follow GCMI’s new LinkedIn feed.

 

In the recent words of two customer colleagues

“Based on deep experience and variety in products supported, GCMI knows the requirements for commercialization across the breadth and depth of new medical technologies from the simplest to the most complex. But they know what’s even more important. They know what a technology needs to be within those requirements to actually be successful in the clinic and in the market.

 

“We can’t get where we want to go, as efficiently and effectively as we need to get there without GCMI.” – Kamil Makhneija, Founder and CEO, Jackson Medical

 

“The quicker you ask and answer the most relevant, pressing, potentially costly questions, the more cost efficient your work will be, not to mention preventing headaches and heartache down the road. GCMI does it every day. They are agile, responsive and can often solve problems with minimal input given their expertise and experience. They absolutely accelerated our commercialization pathway.” – Jud Ready, PhD, Founder & CEO, Hub Hygiene

 

Get in touch & Source: https://gcmiatl.org/2024/06/04/clarification-gcmi-design-and-development-was-not-sold-to-veranex/

By Sheran Brown February 21, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences Designates City of Atlanta as Newest BioReady® Community
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
A renewed push for prescription drug cost reform is gaining momentum in Congress, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee's health subcommittee planning a hearing on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reform for late February. The hearing, to be led by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), signals a revival of bipartisan efforts to regulate these pharmaceutical intermediaries. PBMs, which negotiate drug prices for insurers and employers, have become a focal point in the broader discussion of healthcare costs. A previous bipartisan agreement to regulate these entities was crafted by Carter and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) in the last Congress, though it ultimately stalled when the larger spending bill it was attached to faced opposition. The reform efforts enjoy broad support from both parties and the president, making it one of the few areas with potential for bipartisan cooperation. However, new complications have emerged as Republicans consider using PBM regulations to generate savings for their broader policy agenda, potentially requiring up to $880 billion in cost reductions. The path forward remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about whether such reforms would qualify for budget reconciliation and whether using PBM regulations as a funding mechanism could derail bipartisan cooperation. Meanwhile, stakeholders continue to disagree on the impact of additional PBM regulation, with pharmaceutical companies arguing that PBMs inflate drug costs while PBMs contend that new regulations would increase prices.
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
The Council of State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) has issued a strong warning about proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, emphasizing the critical role these grants play in America's biotech innovation ecosystem. The statement, below , comes amid concerns over recent guidance that would reduce NIH funding to key research institutions. ----------------------- “Today, the US biotech industry employs nearly 2.3 million people across the US and is making positive contributions to economic impact and national security across all 50 states. In fact, for every dollar the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contributes to a successful drug, the private sector invests over $65, underscoring the agency’s unparalleled return on investment. As the associations representing the bioscience industry across the nation, the Council on State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) is concerned by recent guidance that would cut funding provided by the NIH to universities, hospitals, and other institutions that perform critical early-stage research. NIH grant funds are a critical component of our innovation ecosystem. Grants for basic research are the spark that leads to university-driven discoveries, with public-private partnerships and tech transfers that bridge early-stage research to industry-sponsored drug development and ultimately to FDA approved medical advances for hundreds of diseases. While the administration looks for greater efficiency in the use of taxpayer dollars, it cannot be overstated - once scientific innovation moves abroad, it may never return. In the race for scientific innovation around the world, as our adversaries continue to increase government investments in research, we encourage President Trump to follow suit and ensure that we maintain our global leadership in an industry that was created and thrives across the US.”
MORE POSTS
Share by: