The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) released the following statement after today’s announcement from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on selected drugs under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA):

“While the Inflation Reduction Act puts a cap on senior’s out-of-pocket costs, it also contained some very damaging parts that will impede the development of newer and better medicines for all. Important aspects of the IRA are also damaging to the critical role of the United States and our allies to remain the centers of excellence in biotechnology worldwide. With today’s announcement, we see the start of unilateral government mandated price controls. This will inevitably lead the U.S. on a path to higher costs for patients and less access to innovative medicines. 



“The lack of transparency and a scientific approach to decision-making throughout this process undermines the value that these medicines bring to patients in the U.S and around the globe. We are also just beginning to see the harm to patients caused by the unintended consequences of penalizing medicines made as pills. The IRA also includes a damaging provision that will curtail the development of medicines for multiple rare genetic diseases.


“At the same time, Congress and the administration must turn their full attention to health insurers and middlemen who profit by denying Medicare patients and others access to the medicines that their doctors prescribe. This is the source of high costs at the pharmacy and the denial of access to lifesaving treatments and cures. Delay and denial from health insurance companies equals suffering and death. This must be addressed, as well as correcting the most egregious parts of the IRA.”

By Sheran Brown February 21, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences Designates City of Atlanta as Newest BioReady® Community
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
A renewed push for prescription drug cost reform is gaining momentum in Congress, with the House Energy and Commerce Committee's health subcommittee planning a hearing on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reform for late February. The hearing, to be led by Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), signals a revival of bipartisan efforts to regulate these pharmaceutical intermediaries. PBMs, which negotiate drug prices for insurers and employers, have become a focal point in the broader discussion of healthcare costs. A previous bipartisan agreement to regulate these entities was crafted by Carter and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) in the last Congress, though it ultimately stalled when the larger spending bill it was attached to faced opposition. The reform efforts enjoy broad support from both parties and the president, making it one of the few areas with potential for bipartisan cooperation. However, new complications have emerged as Republicans consider using PBM regulations to generate savings for their broader policy agenda, potentially requiring up to $880 billion in cost reductions. The path forward remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about whether such reforms would qualify for budget reconciliation and whether using PBM regulations as a funding mechanism could derail bipartisan cooperation. Meanwhile, stakeholders continue to disagree on the impact of additional PBM regulation, with pharmaceutical companies arguing that PBMs inflate drug costs while PBMs contend that new regulations would increase prices.
By Sheran Brown February 20, 2025
The Council of State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) has issued a strong warning about proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, emphasizing the critical role these grants play in America's biotech innovation ecosystem. The statement, below , comes amid concerns over recent guidance that would reduce NIH funding to key research institutions. ----------------------- “Today, the US biotech industry employs nearly 2.3 million people across the US and is making positive contributions to economic impact and national security across all 50 states. In fact, for every dollar the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contributes to a successful drug, the private sector invests over $65, underscoring the agency’s unparalleled return on investment. As the associations representing the bioscience industry across the nation, the Council on State Biotechnology Associations (CSBA) is concerned by recent guidance that would cut funding provided by the NIH to universities, hospitals, and other institutions that perform critical early-stage research. NIH grant funds are a critical component of our innovation ecosystem. Grants for basic research are the spark that leads to university-driven discoveries, with public-private partnerships and tech transfers that bridge early-stage research to industry-sponsored drug development and ultimately to FDA approved medical advances for hundreds of diseases. While the administration looks for greater efficiency in the use of taxpayer dollars, it cannot be overstated - once scientific innovation moves abroad, it may never return. In the race for scientific innovation around the world, as our adversaries continue to increase government investments in research, we encourage President Trump to follow suit and ensure that we maintain our global leadership in an industry that was created and thrives across the US.”
MORE POSTS
Share by: